I've been using Noodletools for the past 7 or so years and have been hesitant to make the switch to EasyBib.  I don't like some of its features - autociting and the evaluation extensionyou could add in chrome.  It seems students that we are working with cannot identify mistakes/omissions in these automated processes.  If they don't know that something is missing, how can they fix it? Sure, I've heard plenty of people say noodletools is harder for students to use, but I think it is worth it.  It forces them to look at all of the components of  a source--which I also ask them to do when evaluating sources.  I see it as a kill two birds with one stone: evaluate + make a citation.

Seems I went a bit rambly there.  This questions does plague me though.