[MCOH-EH] Are some brands of N95 masks superior to others?

Shea, Joann jshea at tgh.org
Fri Apr 28 13:02:40 PDT 2017


Ditto for us.  We switched from the orange "duck bill" to the VFLEX and have a much better fit, less failures and much better staff satisfaction.    We also offer 3M alternatives if they fail the Vflex.

[TGH_employee health serv-color]
JoAnn Shea, ARNP, MS, COHN-S
Director, Employee Health & Wellness
Work: 813-844-7692    Cell:  813-789-3441    FAX;  813-844-8144    Email:  jshea at tgh.org



From: MCOH-EH [mailto:mcoh-eh-bounces+jshea=tgh.org at mylist.net] On Behalf Of Thanassi, Wendy
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 2:51 PM
To: MCOH/EH <mcoh-eh at mylist.net>
Cc: Tammy Wade <wadeta at ohsu.edu>
Subject: Re: [MCOH-EH] Are some brands of N95 masks superior to others?

We do not have evidence, but the VFLEX 1805 by 3M is much more moldable/flexible and therefore in our experience has better fit profile. We switched to this one.
[https://www.healthykin.com/images/Product/large/4787.jpg]
Wendy

Wendy Thanassi MA, MD
Chief, Occupational Health Service
Office of the Deputy Director
Palo Alto VAHCS, California
650-493-5000 x 11-65214

Associate Professor Affiliated
Stanford Hospital and Clinics

[Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg at 01CE4591.3F9AB100]
Providing the best Occupational Medicine Care Anywhere-for VHA Employees and Veterans
VHAOccupationalEnviroMedConsult at va.gov<mailto:VHAOccupationalEnviroMedConsult at va.gov>  or https://vaww.portal.va.gov/sites/ohshg/OEMedicineConsults<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__vaww.portal.va.gov_sites_ohshg_OEMedicineConsults&d=DwMFAg&c=WxSiHUljzaZa6AO7gfNF1nsjLMo-cFTcJAt_xkKy0sg&r=i5vd-CpfKk0L54XwZivpPw&m=exepV4Kidngq89i75-3L3P65vs3XTPYuG1jFE42jeRU&s=_z2EET10dVU35mxE4MKnn4C2B9rFjeRD2MgkUTzF0Kc&e=>

From: MCOH-EH [mailto:mcoh-eh-bounces at mylist.net] On Behalf Of Tim Crump
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 11:46 AM
To: 'MCOH/EH'
Cc: Tammy Wade
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [MCOH-EH] Are some brands of N95 masks superior to others?

Hello Everyone, We have had a frustrating experience in our N95 mask fit testing, in that we find that more than 1/3 cannot wear our brand of N95 mask.  In many cases this is due to men with facial hair, etc, but we also have a large number of employees who just fail the fit test twice and go onto our PAPR list for respirator protection.  For staff in surgical services, where PAPRs may not be an option, we can be really stuck.  We use the Kimberly-Clark N95 mask that comes in a regular and small size.

I have heard anecdotal reports that the 3M N95 has better success rates.  Does anyone have experiences or evidence on this topic?  Given that 3M has several different N95 models, is there one type that works best in the hospital setting?  Thank you for any input or advice.  Best, Tim

Tim Crump, MSN, FNP
Tim Crump, MSN, FNP
Family Nurse Practitioner
Occupational Health
Healthcare Human Resources

Oregon Health & Science University
3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd
Mail code: UHN 89
Portland, OR 97239-3098
Department Phone: 503-494-5271
Office Phone: 503-346-1152
Fax: 503-494-4457
Email: crumpt at ohsu.edu<mailto:crumpt at ohsu.edu>

Tues, Thurs, Fri, 8-4:30

[cid:3381310330_334556]

The information contained in this EMAIL message is confidential and protected by law. The information is intended only for the person or business identified in the document. If you are not the intended recipient, by sharing or copying the information you are breaking the law. If you have received this EMAIL by mistake, please notify the sender of this EMAIL and do not return, copy or keep the information in the EMAIL.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mylist.net/archives/mcoh-eh/attachments/20170428/b110da72/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5009 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://mylist.net/archives/mcoh-eh/attachments/20170428/b110da72/attachment-0003.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 5583 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <http://mylist.net/archives/mcoh-eh/attachments/20170428/b110da72/attachment-0004.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2550 bytes
Desc: image003.jpg
URL: <http://mylist.net/archives/mcoh-eh/attachments/20170428/b110da72/attachment-0005.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 5092 bytes
Desc: image004.gif
URL: <http://mylist.net/archives/mcoh-eh/attachments/20170428/b110da72/attachment-0001.gif>


More information about the MCOH-EH mailing list