The intent of the Respiratory Protection Program is to protect all HCWs who might come into contact with a patient that has an airborne transmissible disease (ATD, in CDC parlance). This can extend to any HCW that might enter the patient
care area, even briefly – so dietary, lab, x-ray, etc should be included. A thorough program will need to include ALL HCWs with potential exposure – which can be a challenge to interpret how far this extends. Hopefully you have close collaboration with the
Infection Control team as well as Safety experts.
In some institutions, the responsibility for compliance falls on management. In these places, the Employee Health (or equivalent) is responsible for communicating to the department heads who has been fit tested, and the managers ensure
that their employees get it done. In other institutions, the entire responsibility falls on EH. I tend to prefer the former – let the managers do what they are paid to do, and that is manage their own employees, to include ensuring that employees are compliant
with EH requirements (fit testing, flu shots, etc).
How you structure your program to make that happen is up to you, and meeting the challenge of a mobile employee population can be difficult. Your program has to be tailored to the needs of your own organization – I suspect there are about
20 correct answers to this challenge.
A long, but thorough, treatise on this topic may be found here:
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2015-117/pdfs/2015-117.pdf?id=10.26616/NIOSHPUB2015117
Hope this helps a bit.
David
|
From: MCOH-EH [mailto:mcoh-eh-bounces+dcockrum=frhs.org@mylist.net]
On Behalf Of Massey-Jenkins, Angela M
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 5:39 PM
To: MCOH/EH <mcoh-eh@mylist.net>
Subject: [MCOH-EH] RFT
This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If
you suspect the content of this email is malicious, please forward the email to
abuse@frhs.org .
I was wondering what method other facilities are using in determining # of employees should be fit tested to support # of negative airflow rooms on a particular unit? I can’t find any regulatory guidelines on this, and considering it
is necessary to fit test all employees, 100% of them, in a particular unit that have a negative airflow rooms, but maybe a portion of them, which would also make it more difficult to track. Which brings me to my next question, how do you track these employees
to ensure compliancy if it isn’t 100% of the entire dept., with employee movement from one dept to another? We have a very large system, approx. 30,000 employees, total.
Thanks for any feedback.
Angela Massey-Jenkins, RN, BSN
AHC EOHS-Clinical Operations Manager
IU Health
317.962.2563