[MCOH-EH] Are some brands of N95 masks superior to others?

Jayme Kasman jkasman at bartonhealth.org
Thu Apr 27 12:16:58 PDT 2017


We currently use the 3M1860S, 3M1860 Regular, and Kimberly Clark duckbill
(small) and have the same issue. About 1/3 of our staff can not fit to any
of the N95 respirators we offer due to facial changes as in pregnancy,
facial hair or just not a satisfactory fit and are assigned a PAPR. Our
N95s are needed infrequently at our facilities, which also causes the
problem of improper mask placement despite annual training. We are in the
process of looking at replacing our current PAPR with a MaxAir CAPR. This
is a more comfortable, faster donning/doffing, more patient friendly
"PAPR." The added benefits would be increased protective factor and an
overall cost savings by no longer having to perform fit testing annually.
Unfortunately, we would need to continue fit testing OR staff, but I
believe that Syntech is in the process of FDA/NIOSH approval of the CAPR
for use in sterile environments.

Hope this helps...my big issue with N95 respirators is the less than
optimal protection they provide in light of increased globalization and
novel diseases.

Jayme Kasman RN, MSN
Employee Health Nurse
Barton Occupational Health

P. 775.589.8935  F. 775.589.8987

jkasman at bartonhealth.org

www.bartonhealth.org

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message.




On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:00 PM, <mcoh-eh-request at mylist.net> wrote:

> Send MCOH-EH mailing list submissions to
>         mcoh-eh at mylist.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://mylist.net/listinfo/mcoh-eh
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         mcoh-eh-request at mylist.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         mcoh-eh-owner at mylist.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of MCOH-EH digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re:  Are some brands of N95 masks superior to others?
>       (Hodgson, Michael - OSHA)
>    2. Re:  Are some brands of N95 masks superior to others?
>       (Kathy.Dayvault at dekalbmedical.org)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 18:55:48 +0000
> From: "Hodgson, Michael - OSHA" <Hodgson.Michael at dol.gov>
> To: MCOH/EH <mcoh-eh at mylist.net>
> Cc: Tammy Wade <wadeta at ohsu.edu>
> Subject: Re: [MCOH-EH] Are some brands of N95 masks superior to
>         others?
> Message-ID: <6CCAAB329D1FCFB1D4469F4BD1F22967ABF3D3F2 at unknown>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Chris Coffee from NIOSH has a publication in his from ~15 years ago
>
> ________________________________
> On: 27 April 2017 14:47, "Tim Crump" <crumpt at ohsu.edu> wrote:
> Hello Everyone, We have had a frustrating experience in our N95 mask fit
> testing, in that we find that more than 1/3 cannot wear our brand of N95
> mask.  In many cases this is due to men with facial hair, etc, but we also
> have a large number of employees who just fail the fit test twice and go
> onto our PAPR list for respirator protection.  For staff in surgical
> services, where PAPRs may not be an option, we can be really stuck.  We use
> the Kimberly-Clark N95 mask that comes in a regular and small size.
>
> I have heard anecdotal reports that the 3M N95 has better success rates.
> Does anyone have experiences or evidence on this topic?  Given that 3M has
> several different N95 models, is there one type that works best in the
> hospital setting?  Thank you for any input or advice.  Best, Tim
>
> Tim Crump, MSN, FNP
> Tim Crump, MSN, FNP
> Family Nurse Practitioner
> Occupational Health
> Healthcare Human Resources
>
> Oregon Health & Science University
> 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd
> Mail code: UHN 89
> Portland, OR 97239-3098
> Department Phone: 503-494-5271
> Office Phone: 503-346-1152
> Fax: 503-494-4457
> Email: crumpt at ohsu.edu<mailto:crumpt at ohsu.edu>
>
> Tues, Thurs, Fri, 8-4:30
>
> [cid:3381310330_334556]
>
> The information contained in this EMAIL message is confidential and
> protected by law. The information is intended only for the person or
> business identified in the document. If you are not the intended recipient,
> by sharing or copying the information you are breaking the law. If you have
> received this EMAIL by mistake, please notify the sender of this EMAIL and
> do not return, copy or keep the information in the EMAIL.
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mylist.net/archives/mcoh-eh/attachments/20170427/
> 52525f79/attachment-0001.html>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: image001.gif
> Type: image/gif
> Size: 5092 bytes
> Desc: image001.gif
> URL: <http://mylist.net/archives/mcoh-eh/attachments/20170427/
> 52525f79/attachment-0001.gif>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:57:17 -0400
> From: Kathy.Dayvault at dekalbmedical.org
> To: MCOH/EH <mcoh-eh at mylist.net>
> Cc: "MCOH-EH" <mcoh-eh-bounces at mylist.net>,     Tammy Wade
>         <wadeta at ohsu.edu>
> Subject: Re: [MCOH-EH] Are some brands of N95 masks superior to
>         others?
> Message-ID:
>         <OFF17420AB.9C388F35-ON8525810F.006786CD-8525810F.
> 00681AC4 at dekalbmedical.org>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> According to OSHA regulations, you have to offer more than 1 type of
> respirator.
>
> We Use the duck bill and  the 3M 1860 regular and small.
>
> For very small faces, the 3M 1870s, works very well.
>
> Men are required to shave (not clean) so that there is no hair between the
> seal of the mask and the skin...also in the OSHA reg.
>
> Very full beards are an Infection control issue as well and in patient
> facing areas such as nursing units, their beards should be well trimmed.
>
> If a male has a religious or medical reason for not shaving, they are sent
> to HR, employee relations for an accommodation.
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> Kathy Dayvault, RN, BSN, MPH
>  Manager, Occupational Health and Safety
>  WorksWell Onsite
>  Dekalb Medical  2701 North Decatur Road
>  Decatur, GA 30033
> ph: 404.501.4972 Fax:404-501-2045
> kathy.dayvault at dekalbmedical.org
>
>
>
>
> From:   "Tim Crump" <crumpt at ohsu.edu>
> To:     "'MCOH/EH'" <mcoh-eh at mylist.net>,
> Cc:     Tammy Wade <wadeta at ohsu.edu>
> Date:   04/27/2017 02:47 PM
> Subject:        [MCOH-EH] Are some brands of N95 masks superior to others?
> Sent by:        "MCOH-EH" <mcoh-eh-bounces at mylist.net>
>
>
>
> Hello Everyone, We have had a frustrating experience in our N95 mask fit
> testing, in that we find that more than 1/3 cannot wear our brand of N95
> mask.  In many cases this is due to men with facial hair, etc, but we also
> have a large number of employees who just fail the fit test twice and go
> onto our PAPR list for respirator protection.  For staff in surgical
> services, where PAPRs may not be an option, we can be really stuck.  We
> use the Kimberly-Clark N95 mask that comes in a regular and small size.
>
> I have heard anecdotal reports that the 3M N95 has better success rates.
> Does anyone have experiences or evidence on this topic?  Given that 3M has
> several different N95 models, is there one type that works best in the
> hospital setting?  Thank you for any input or advice.  Best, Tim
>
> Tim Crump, MSN, FNP
> Tim Crump, MSN, FNP
> Family Nurse Practitioner
> Occupational Health
> Healthcare Human Resources
>
> Oregon Health & Science University
> 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd
> Mail code: UHN 89
> Portland, OR 97239-3098
> Department Phone: 503-494-5271
> Office Phone: 503-346-1152
> Fax: 503-494-4457
> Email: crumpt at ohsu.edu
>
> Tues, Thurs, Fri, 8-4:30
>
>
>
> The information contained in this EMAIL message is confidential and
> protected by law. The information is intended only for the person or
> business identified in the document. If you are not the intended
> recipient, by sharing or copying the information you are breaking the law.
> If you have received this EMAIL by mistake, please notify the sender of
> this EMAIL and do not return, copy or keep the information in the EMAIL.
>  ---------------------------------------
> The MCOH-EH List is moderated by Joe Fanucchi MD FACOEM and Mike Band DO.
> List membership is free, but only subscribers may post to the list.
> To post send messages to: mcoh-eh at mylist.net
> To become a subscriber, or to change your subscription options (turn off
> email while you're on vacation, etc):   http://www.mcoh-eh.net
> MediTrax / Occupational Health Systems, Inc. provides financial support to
> ensure the list remains a free resource for the occupational health
> community.
> ---------------------------------------
> List archives (public): http://mylist.net/archives/mcoh-eh/
> ---------------------------------------
> Send administrative requests to: drjoe at meditrax.com
> ---------------------------------------
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail, including attachments, is for the
> sole use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may contain
> confidential and privileged information, including HIPAA protected PHI. Any
> unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution, or reproduction is
> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
> sender by reply e-mail and destroy this message and its attachments in its
> entirety.
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mylist.net/archives/mcoh-eh/attachments/20170427/
> fca924f1/attachment-0001.html>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: image/gif
> Size: 5092 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <http://mylist.net/archives/mcoh-eh/attachments/20170427/
> fca924f1/attachment-0001.gif>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> ---------------------------------------
> The MCOH-EH List is moderated by Joe Fanucchi MD FACOEM and Mike Band DO.
> List membership is free, but only subscribers may post to the list.
> To post send messages to: mcoh-eh at mylist.net
> To become a subscriber, or to change your subscription options (turn off
> email while you're on vacation, etc):   http://www.mcoh-eh.net
> MediTrax / Occupational Health Systems, Inc. provides financial support to
> ensure the list remains a free resource for the occupational health
> community.
> ---------------------------------------
> List archives (public): http://mylist.net/archives/mcoh-eh/
> ---------------------------------------
> Send administrative requests to: drjoe at meditrax.com
> ---------------------------------------
> When replying to a message, PLEASE delete all footers, and all messages to
> which you're NOT replying, so the topic of your reply is immediately clear
> to other list members.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of MCOH-EH Digest, Vol 252, Issue 139
> *****************************************
>

-- 
*Confidentiality Notice:* This e-mail message, including any attachments, 
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).  It may contain 
confidential and privileged information, such as health information or 
trade secrets, that may be restricted from further use or disclosure by 
state and federal law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
immediately contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of 
the original message.  Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mylist.net/archives/mcoh-eh/attachments/20170427/49a305ec/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the MCOH-EH mailing list